The Conscious Nematode: Exploring Hallmarks of Minimal Phenomenal Consciousness in Caenorhabditis Elegans
By Vasco Grilošø @ 2025-12-05T17:35 (+30)
This is a linkpost to https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10723751/
This is a linkpost for The Conscious Nematode: Exploring Hallmarks of Minimal Phenomenal Consciousness in Caenorhabditis Elegans by Diego Becerra, Andrea Calixto, and Patricio Orio, which was originally published on the International Journal of Psychological Research in October 2023. Below are the abstract, summary of the evidence for consciousness in Caenorhabditis (C.) elegans, and my quick thoughts.
Abstract
While subcellular components of cognition and aļ¬ectivity that involve the interaction between experience, environment, and physiology -such as learning, trauma, or emotion- are being identiļ¬ed, the physical mechanisms of phenomenal consciousness remain more elusive. We are interested in exploring whether ancient, simpler organisms such as nematodes have minimal consciousness. Is there something that feels like to be a worm? Or are worms blind machines? āSimplerā models allow us to simultaneously extract data from multiple levels such as slow and fast neural dynamics, structural connectivity, molecular dynamics, behavior, decision making, etc., and thus, to test predictions of the current frameworks in dispute. In the present critical review, we summarize the current models of consciousness in order to reassess in light of the new evidence whether Caenorhabditis elegans, a nematode with a nervous system composed of 302 neurons, has minimal consciousness. We also suggest empirical paths to further advance consciousness research using C. elegans.
Summary of the evidence for consciousness in Caenorhabditis elegans
Table 1. Summary of the Current Evidence of the Criteria Reviewed in the Literature for Experiencing (Phenomenal Consciousness) in C. Elegans.
| Criteria | Found in C. elegans | References |
| Diļ¬erentiated states and global activity | Yes. C. elegans forward and backward gaits are generated by either a reflex chain, or one or more CPGās [central pattern generators]. Also, pirouettes and other motor commands require reverberating collective nested neural dynamics. Finally, it is argued that C. elegans have true sleep states, and its behavior changes globally under some anesthetics. | Wen et al., 2012; Olivares et al., 2018; Kato et al., 2015; Kaplan et al., 2020; Trojanowski & Raizen, 2016; Nichols et al., 2017; Nambyiah & Brown, 2021 |
| Binding and integration | Yes. There is evidence for multisensory (chemical, mechanical and thermal) integration. Also, several sensory neurons in C. elegans are polymodal. Finally, a computational model of C. elegansā neural activity show positive values of Phi (Ļ) [see integrated information theory] | Ghosh et al., 2017; Metaxakis et al., 2018; Goodman & Sengupta, 2019; Antonopoulos et al., 2016 |
| Flexible evaluative system | Perhaps. C. elegans is capable of non-associative and associative learning, and of integrating cues with opposing value in order to make a decision. There is some evidence of experience-dependent preferences, gustatory plasticity, and second order learning. | Ardiel & Rankin, 2010; Ghosh et al., 2017; Guillermin et al., 2017; Dekkers et al., 2021; Merritt et al., 2019 |
| Embodiment and self | Perhaps. There is an efferent copy of motor commands. Communication with bacteria promotes intergenerational memories depending on the bacteriumās virulence. Induction of diapause is pheromone-dependent and thus, C. elegans can recognize its community. | Ji et al., 2021; Palominos et al., 2017; Gabaldon & Calixto, 2019 |
| Intentionality | Not known. Mapping of worldly objects or C. elegansā own body in neuronal networks seems limited, and goaloriented behavior doesnāt seem to be informed by internal states decoupled from the immediate environment. | |
| Selective attention | Not known. |
My quick thoughts
I think further research on the sentience of nematodes would be useful. This is one of the āFour Investigation Prioritiesā mentioned in section 13.4 of chapter 13 of the book The Edge of Sentience by Jonathan Birch. However, I believe investigating the (expected hedonistic) welfare per animal-year of nematodes and other soil animals conditional on sentience is a much higher priority. I am much more uncertain about it than the probability of sentience. I would not be surprised if I changed my view that one should optimise for increasing the welfare of soil animals and maybe microorganisms. Meanwhile, I continue to recommend research informing how to increase the welfare of soil animals.