Advice for EA org staff and EA group organisers interacting with political campaigns

By Catherine Low🔸 @ 2024-06-16T21:26 (+74)

Compiled by CEA’s Community Health team

2024 is the biggest year for elections in history(!), and while many of these elections have passed, some important elections are upcoming, including the UK and US elections, providing a potentially large opportunity to have an impact through political change. 

Countries with elections in 2024

This post is intended 

  1. To make it easier for EA group organisers and organisation staff to adhere to the laws in relevant countries
  2. And more generally, to help the community be able to take high impact actions now and in the future by reducing risks of polarisation of EA and the cause areas we care about. 

Two main concerns: Legal risks and risks around polarisation and epistemics

Legal risks

Charities and organisations associated with/funded by charities have constraints on what political activities they can do. See “More about legal risks.”

Note: This post is not legal advice. Our team is employed by US and UK charities (Effective Ventures US and UK). So, we have a little familiarity with the legal situations for groups/organisations that are based in the US or UK (many EA organisations), and groups/organisations that are funded by charities in the US or UK (even more EA groups and organisations). We have very little knowledge about the legal situation relating to other countries. 

It could be useful for groups/orgs in any country (including US and UK) to get independent legal advice.

Risks around polarisation and epistemics

These risks include

Of course, the upside of doing political work could be extremely high. So our recommendation isn’t for EAs to stop doing political work, but to be very careful to think through risks when choosing your actions.  

Some related ideas about the risks of polarisation and political advocacy:

  1. Climate change policy and politics in the US 
  2. Lesson 7: Even among EAs, politics might somewhat degrade our typical epistemics and rigor 
  3. To Oppose Polarization, Tug Sideways
  4. Politics on the EA Forum 

 

More about legal risks

If your group/organisation is a charity or is funded by a charity

In many (or maybe all?) places, charities or organisations funded by charities are NOT allowed to engage in political campaigning. 

E.g. 

Violations of these rules could result in the charity status being revoked from an organisation, which would be very costly. 

If your organisation is not a registered charity, and is not funded by registered charity

Even if the above rules do not formally apply to your org, it could still be good to consider the above suggestions to reduce the chances that 

Individuals: If you’re not a citizen or permanent resident

Many countries also have laws disallowing people who are not citizens or permanent residents from participating in some (or all) ways in a campaign.

E.g. 

If you’re interested in getting involved in campaigns in a place where you can’t vote, check out the relevant laws. It is probably worth being extremely cautious if you’re hoping to get residency, work permits, or visitor visas for the country you’re hoping to campaign in. 

Involvement as a private citizen when you are affiliated with an EA org

EA group organisers and EA org staff can still campaign for, or donate to, political campaigns in their own country as a private citizen. But sometimes it can be blurry when you are and when you aren’t acting as a private citizen. If you are campaigning using platforms where you’re known by your role in an EA org or EA group, you should be careful to be clear that any campaigning is being done as a private citizen, and unassociated with your role. 

However, if you are campaigning using a platform/to an audience that you have access to as a result of your role, just stating that you are acting as a private citizen may not be enough. E.g. a group organiser sharing a political announcement in a group meeting or an EA org staff member using the office after hours for political meetings.

Some guidelines we’ve heard law firms recommend to U.S. charities: 

  1. Avoid using methods of promotion where you are primarily known by your role in the charity or funded organisation (e.g. Slacks where you represent the charity/funded org, using your org email address, sending info on org newsletters). In any public or media context–including charity publications and interactions with the public–clearly and unambiguously state that your actions and statements are yours as an individual and not those of the org.
  2. Don’t make any campaign announcements at events run by the charity.
  3. Don’t use any contact lists you have access to due to your involvement in the charity.
  4. If you want to post/comment on the Forum or another publicly visible space doing some kind of political advocacy on behalf of yourself, you should be explicit that this is a personal comment.

 

Advice for EA group organisers

Risks

Although involvement in politics and policy is a really promising way of doing good for the world, there are some legal, reputational and epistemic challenges that are worth considering when groups want to get involved in political activities.

Political campaigning might negatively affect the ability of EA and individual EAs to have impact in the causes you are particularly interested in. Things to consider:

Suggestions

Talking to journalists about a political campaign

If you represent EA or an EA group in some way, and get asked for an interview, or asked to comment, or would like to contact a journalist about your / your group’s / EA’s relationship with any candidates or parties you are welcome to ask for advice from Emma Richter from CEA’s Communications Team (emma.richter@centreforeffectivealtruism.org). 

She might be able to help with assessing the journalist/outlet, giving you background information, and advising on whether and how it would be good to answer. We can also provide media training and liaise with a communications firm we work with for more support and advice. 

Using the EA Forum 

The EA Forum can be used to discuss political campaigns, parties or candidates:

Our policy about politics is outlined in this post. In brief: 

The following types of posts will be in the “Personal Blog” category (meaning that they will not appear on Frontpage for users who haven't modified the default settings, but will appear in “All Posts,” in the author’s profile, and on any relevant tag pages):

Some political content will continue to receive “Frontpage” categorization:


 

  1. ^

    Note, though, sometimes candidates are closely identified with a prominent issue or stance on an issue so taking a public position on an issue that aligns with one candidate (without naming the candidate) could still potentially be seen as taking political action. Please also consider the potential that these actions promoting specific pieces of legislation may qualify as “lobbying.” See IRS guidance on lobbying. 


Arden Koehler @ 2024-06-19T13:16 (+2)

Thanks for this valuable reminder!

btw, the link on "more about legal risks" at the top goes to the wrong place.