Interested in EA/longtermist research careers? Here are my top recommended resources

By MichaelA🔸 @ 2022-06-26T17:13 (+112)

Since 2020, I estimate I've given career advice to >200 people in the EA community. This post is my up-to-date, prioritized list of recommended resources for people who are interested in research careers, longtermism-aligned careers, and/or working at EA orgs (rather than e.g. high-impact roles at non-EA orgs that work on relevant topics). The more you're interested in each of those three things, the more likely it is that this post will be useful to you - but I expect it would also be useful to many people interested in just one or two of those things. 

This post is also likely to be more useful to people who are earlier in their relevant career journeys, since many of the resources will be well-known or unnecessary for people with more relevant experience. 

Will these resources be useful to you? Hard to say, as I don't know you or what you already know! But this post itself should only take a few minutes to read, and then you can make your own decision about which links to open and how closely to engage with them.

These resources should hopefully help you have an impact, build your career capital (e.g., knowledge, skills, connections, and credentials), & test your personal fit for various roles, and find other good advice or valuable opportunities for doing those things. This post won't itself give you many specific tips.

I've bolded the resources that I expect will typically be most useful.

Behold! The herald resources:

Things you could apply to

Other sources of career advice 

Advice on doing good research/writing

Other ways to build career capital and/or test your fit for various roles

Parts of this post are adapted from a collection of resources put together for people who applied to Rethink Priorities but didn't end up with an offer. That older collection was put together by me with some help from some of my colleagues at RP, e.g. Peter Wildeford. But I wrote this in a personal capacity and it doesn't necessarily represent the views of my colleagues or anyone else.


MichaelA @ 2022-06-26T17:13 (+22)

Resources that are only relevant to people interested in AI governance and (to some extent) technical AI safety

Mess_Bomb @ 2022-06-26T22:34 (+23)

Strong +1 to the "work through all or part of the curriculum independently". Having participated in AGISF (governance track), I'd say that >95% of the value for me came from doing the reading, as opposed to participating in the discussion sessions.

(I don't want this comment to be seen as a negative review of the discussions - I'm mainly making this point because I think almost anyone can get significant value out of following the curriculum themselves, and so I'd like to nudge people toward feeling agency and viewing self study as A Thing You Can Do.)

MichaelA @ 2022-06-26T18:00 (+4)

Notes on things I should consider integrating into this post later

(I expect I'll add to this comment in future)