How teams went about their research at AI Safety Camp edition 8

Executive summary: Fourteen teams formed at AI Safety Camp to explore different approaches for ensuring safe and beneficial AI. Teams investigated topics like soft optimization, interpretable architectures, policy regulation, failure scenarios, scientific discovery models, and theological perspectives. They summarized key insights and published some initial findings. Most teams plan to continue collaborating.

Key points:

1. One team looked at foundations of soft optimization, exploring variants of quantilization and issues like Goodhart's curse.
2. A team reviewed frameworks like "positive attractors" and "interpretable architectures", finding promise but also potential issues.
3. One group focused on EU AI Act policy, drafting standards text for high-risk AI regulation.
4. A team mapped possible paths to AI failure, creating stories about uncontrolled AI like "Agentic Mess".
5. Some investigated current scientific discovery models, finding impressive capabilities but issues like hallucination.
6. Researchers explored connections between Islam and AI safety, relating perspectives on AI as a being.
7. Teams published initial findings and plan further collaboration. Most see their projects as starting points for ongoing research.

This comment was auto-generated by the EA Forum Team. Feel free to point out issues with this summary by replying to the comment, and contact us if you have feedback.