2022 Effective Animal Advocacy Forum Survey: Results and analysis

By Rethink Priorities, Laura Duffy @ 2023-07-25T00:31 (+54)

This is a linkpost to https://rethinkpriorities.org/publications/2022-effective-animal-advocacy-forum-survey

Introduction

In September 2022, the Effective Animal Advocacy (EAA) Coordination Forum (now titled the Animal Advocacy Strategy Forum) was held with the purpose of bringing together key decision-makers in the animal advocacy community to connect, coordinate, and strategize. The attendees represented approximately 20 key groups in the effective animal advocacy space.

At the end of the forum, 25 participants filled out a survey that sought to better understand the future needs of effective animal advocacy groups and the perceptions of animal advocates about the most important areas to focus on in the future. This report analyzes the results of that survey.

Key Takeaways

On average, respondents to the EAA Survey believe that:

In addition, a plurality of respondents believes that:

When asked about issues facing the effective animal advocacy movement:

Click here for the full version of this report on the Rethink Priorities website.

Acknowledgments

This report is a project of Rethink Priorities–a think tank dedicated to informing decisions made by high-impact organizations and funders across various cause areas. It was written by Laura Duffy. Thanks to William McAuliffe for helpful feedback and to Adam Papineau for copy-editing.

If you are interested in RP’s work, please visit our research database and subscribe to our newsletter.


Felix_Werdermann @ 2023-07-26T23:00 (+4)

Who did fill out the survey or which "key groups" are represented?

MichaelStJules @ 2023-07-25T20:16 (+2)

I'm somewhat surprised that "economics and social sciences (11 votes)" and "Forecasting ability (5 votes)" got so many votes, but "Generalist researchers (2 votes)" got so few. I consider economics, social sciences and (some) forecasting to be pretty standard parts of the roles of generalist researchers. But maybe they want more (specific) expertise than a generalist researcher would normally have?