If there were another discussion week, what would you like it to be on and when?

Animal welfare is far more effective per $ than Global Health. 

Edit:

How about "The marginal $100 mn on animal welfare is 10x the impact of the marginal $100 mn on Global Health"

I would like a discussion week once a month-ish.

How can we best find new EA donors?

I have a lot of respect for OP, but I think it's clear that we could really use a larger funding base. My guess is that there should be a lot more thinking here.

Should Global Health comprise more than 15% of EA funding? 

Where do we want EA to be in ~20 years?

I'd like there to be more envisioning of what sorts of cultures, strengths, and community we want to aim for. I think there's not much attention here now.

AI Safety Advocates have been responsible for over half of the leading AI companies. We don't take that seriously enough.

Why, if anyone, should be leaders within Effective Altruism?

I think that OP often actively doesn't want much responsibility. CEA is the more obvious fit, but they often can only do so much, and also they arguably very much represent OP's interests more than that of EA community members. (just look at where their funding is coming from, or the fact that there's no way for EA community members to vote on their board or anything). 

I think that there's a clear responsibility gap and would like to see more understanding here, along with ideally plans of how things can improve.

Epistemics/forecasting should be an EA cause area

I'd like a debate week once every 2 months-ish.

Worldview diversity isn't a coherent concept and mainly exists to manage internal OpenPhil conflict.

Decision making is a personal favorite cause area of mine and I'd like to see a lot more discussion around it than there is right now, especially because it seems to hold immense potential.

Decision making is a personal favorite cause are of mine and I'd like to see a lot more discussion around it than there is right now, especially because it seems to hold immense potential.

Sensemaking of AI governance. What do people think is most promising and what are their cruxes.

Besides posts, I would like to see some kind of survey that quantifies and graphs people's believes.

I really liked the discussion week on PauseAI. I'd like to see another one on this topic, taking up the new developments in reasons and evidence.

When?
Probably there are other topics that didn't have a week, so they should be prioritized. I think PauseAI is one of the most important topics. So, maybe in the next 3 - 9 months?

While existential risks are widely acknowledged as an important cause area, some EA’s like William MacAskill have argued that “Trajectory Change” may be highly contingent even if x-risk is solved and so may be just as important for the long-term future. I would like to see this debated as a cause area

Wild animal welfare and longtermist animal welfare versus farmed animal welfare?