Pilot Results: High-Impact Psychology/ Mental Health (HIPsy)

By Inga @ 2023-09-07T12:27 (+40)

This is a rough write-up of the results of all the HIPsy pilot activities, outcomes, and suggestions on what to do next. 

Below, you can find links to created resources for those involved in psychology or mental health who aim to maximize their impact. Additionally, there are results from events and surveys highlighting which (other) resources might be most beneficial for enhancing their impact. You can learn more about the initial project and plan in this EA forum post

Executive summary

Outcomes

Materials created


 

Surveys to test demand

Click the "results-links" to SEE ALL RESULTS in GoogleForms.

  1. (n=164) People interested in Mental Health as a cause area (results, skip the questions in the beginning about the talk "Revolutionizing Mental Health” to get to the expressions of interest in activities)
  2. (n=76) People interested in using psychology for EA causes (results)
  3. (n=77) People with a background in psychology (results)
  4. (N=187) People in the EA community interested in improving their mental health and productivity in cooperation with Mental Health Navigator (results. This is the corresponding EA forum post.)

Remark: Email addresses and some qualitative answers have been deleted from the results view because I don’t want to reveal the identity of any participant. But most of the people from surveys 1-3 are waiting to be informed when resources they are interested in will be available.

The highest level of interest in infrastructural activities, as indicated by survey participation and pre-signups, has been for global mental health topics and mental health services for the EA community rather than activities aimed at psychologists or applying psychology to EA cause areas The latter two sample sizes are about half of the former two.


 

Piloted events

 

Summary of Survey Results

Samples and Recruitment

  1. n=1 Mental Health as a cause area
    I asked people to fill this out after the Talk about mental health as a cause area and posted it in relevant groups such as “EA Mental Health Slack”, and the Facebook group “EA, Happiness and Mental Health”.
     
  2. n=54 people with a psychology background
    I asked people to fill this out during two EAGx meetups “High-Impact Psychology” + “Psychological, cognitive and behavioral science”, and also in the Facebook group “Psychology for EA”.

    (Most prominent result: 41 of 54 people with a psychology background said a career path profile would likely increase their impact in our survey→ Done with Probably Good)
     
  3. n=64 people who’d like to increase their impact with psychology
    I asked people to fill this out during the EAGx meetup “High-Impact  Psychology” + diverse facebook and Slack groups + in the Facebook group “Psychology for EA”.  
    to focus on the Mental Health field mainly

In the latter two surveys, more participants would be needed to assess the demand. The lower number of participants might indicate a lower interest. I, therefore, decided to mainly focus on the Mental Health field. Therefore, if this project is continued, the initiative shall be renamed to “High Impact Mental Health” instead of “High-Impact Psychology”, and the work would focus on corresponding efforts. 

 

Excerpt of Results on EA Mental Health infrastructure Survey

You can find the full version of this survey and also of the other ones if you click the “results” links above. Here, I just post an excerpt, that might not contain the most relevant points.

→ Suggestion for follow-up project: It might be useful to update the Research Topics of Effective Thesis for their Mental Health category (talked about with Kirkham), by working together with field experts from relevant sub-areas of Inga’s (my) network (has not happened yet)

 

What next? 

The suggestion for the follow-up project is to hire a project manager full-time for one year. The goal would be to establish a low-cost, sustainable infrastructure for “High Impact Mental Health” activities working with volunteers.

This would include:

Some project manager candidates have been checked, but more systematic outreach would be helpful in finding suitable individuals. This would require follow-up funding, i.e., a two-month salary, to run an appropriate hiring and fundraising process.  

Why do I believe funding these activities might be highly impactful? Many of the people who took part in the surveys are on the way of trying to figure out how to best make an impact in the mental health space and could do so quicker with the help of the right resources. I embarked on the same journey 2 years ago when I learned about EA and tried to find the best next steps forward. Most of the events and materials suggested as options in the survey are ones that I would have benefitted from as well, as they would have enabled me to move quicker and, therefore do more good, and it seems to be the case that surveys participants felt the same way. Also, I saw loads of people trying to make an impact in the mental health space who made “wrong decisions”, and wasted lots of resources (time, money) due to a lack of easily available and helpful information. Examples of “wrong" decisions I have heard more than once: coming up with and implementing interventions that don’t target key bottlenecks or have shown not to work well or are missing relevant aspects to cause engagement, not collecting speaking effectiveness data on new interventions in time, not tailoring interventions to target groups well enough.

Are you interested in... 

In each case, I am happy to hand over the project, advise, or be involved in a capacity of up to 20% (8 hours/week).

Thanks


 


SebastianSchmidt @ 2023-09-07T21:25 (+3)

Thanks for the post Inga.

When thinking about mental health as a cause area in EA, I think it's important to separate global mental health (e.g., anxiety and depression globally) from mental health amongst impact oriented individuals (e.g., EAs). I refer to the latter as development of impact oriented individuals as it wouldn't only consider mental health but also things such as skill building or character development. All with the intention of increasing their capacity for doing the most good.

Can I ask why you didn't mention Effective Peer Support?

Inga @ 2023-09-08T11:16 (+1)

Thanks for sharing your thoughts, Sebastian. In this HIPsy pilot project, one survey has addressed the infrastructural needs within the global mental field. This is the one I created the excerpt for in the post. The demand for mental health-related services among impact-oriented individuals has been addressed by a separate survey – the results and the corresponding other EA forum post are linked above.
Effective Peer Support is a different project, creating and evaluating a specific intervention for changemakers, which is why I don't mention it here.

SebastianSchmidt @ 2023-09-13T08:18 (+1)

Understood. So Rethinking Well-being is quite distinct from HIPsy?