Box inversion revisited

Executive summary: The "box inversion hypothesis" claims that AI safety problems from the "agent foundations" perspective involving powerful AI systems in boxes have mirrored problems in the "ecosystems of AI" perspective with optimization pressure outside boxes. This surprising correspondence suggests novel angles for tackling key issues.

Key points:

1. Problems with ontologies that arise with single AGIs have analogues with regulating complex ecosystems of AI services.
2. Issues like AI systems resisting shutdown mirror ecosystem dynamics that lead to entrenched, human-unfriendly equilibria.
3. Setting up enduring, trustworthy security services resembles creating reliably corrigible AGIs. Both face convergent incentives making them drift from human-alignment.
4. The economy's current rough human-alignment may not persist as AI systems become more capable. Without interventions, aggregate optimization pressure could marginalize human values.
5. Formalizing the "inversion" concept could yield insights, but the pattern already suggests novel angles on core problems.
6. Ecosystem-scale issues may pose the majority of unmitigated existential risks from AI despite progress on aligning individual systems.

This comment was auto-generated by the EA Forum Team. Feel free to point out issues with this summary by replying to the comment, and contact us if you have feedback.