Online EAGs are underrated (FBB #11)
By gergo @ 2025-12-07T16:53 (+24)
I’ve been meaning to write this post for a while, but EA Connect gave me the final motivational push :)
Many EAs I talk to seem to treat online vs. offline conferences like this:
Online:
- “I will register and listen in for the most interesting talks, but otherwise won’t spend much time at the conference.”
- “I will let people book a call with me, but I won’t actively source 1-1s.”
Offline:
- “I will book as many 1-1s as I can reasonably take (or more) to get the most out of the conference.”
I think this is a mistake. One should take the same approach to virtual conferences as to in-person ones, and slightly tweak their current approach (insofar as it’s similar to the above) to make in-person conferences more serendipitous.
Online conferences that use Swapcard have several advantages over in-person ones:
- You can talk to people who live far away and whom you’d otherwise be unlikely to connect with.
- You can give people your online calendar instead of putting up with Swapcard’s scheduling tool, making meetings lower friction.[1]
- Rescheduling is easier.
- You can take a larger number of meetings: shorter default durations feel more natural, and it’s easier to end early if there’s less to discuss.
- It’s easier to take care of yourself and relax when calling from home, letting you free up more of your weekend while getting similar benefit.
- Scheduling calls for the following week feels more appropriate than trying to fit everything into the conference window.
- I case you want to attend a talk, you can join later and play it at 1.5x speed, so you can still catch up by the end and ask questions.
Cons of online meetings:
- You don’t get to experience the “vibe” of the person as much, which makes building trust harder, reducing the likelihood of future collaboration.
- Some people might not want to take calls the following week.
- More senior EAs are perhaps less likely to attend unless they are giving a talk.
- Less fun overall (I treat these more like work than in-person ones).
- No awesome afterparty.
When it comes to in-person conferences, I think there is more value in setting aside some "free time" to talk to people more serendipitously. This allows for a larger number of connections per 25 minutes, and it also just happens to be fun.
See also: Tacit knowledge: how I *exactly* approach EAG(x) conferences
- ^
On Swapcard, people often book each other for times that don’t actually work. Clicking “attend” on a talk doesn’t block that slot, and manually updating availability is a pain.
david_reinstein @ 2025-12-07T23:58 (+2)
Did you get the titles for offline and online reversed for the bullets at the top?
JoA🔸 @ 2025-12-07T19:05 (+2)
Strongly agree with this post! EA Connect has been more useful to me than the two in-person EA conferences I've attended, and I estimate I've been far more useful (as a mentor, but not only) at EA Connect than at these other conferences.
No awesome afterparty
I wonder if say, links to post-conference games of Gartic Phone and the like could be a low-cost way to recreate that moment where everyone winds down (esp since the online conference feels more serious and formal) for those who would be interested. (Not confident it's a good idea, just throwing it out there.)