Request for Proposals: Effective Careers

By Melanie Basnak🔸, Kearney Capuano 🔸 @ 2026-03-16T19:37 (+40)

This is a linkpost to https://coefficientgiving.org/funds/effective-giving-and-careers/request-for-proposals-effective-careers/

We are excited to announce a new Request for Proposals (RFP) for effective career organizations, defined as initiatives devoted to providing mentorship, advice, and opportunities to help people pursue highly impactful careers. Through this RFP, we aim to identify and support additional efforts in the effective careers space and streamline the application process for potential grantees.

Motivation

The Effective Giving & Careers program supports a variety of effective career organizations across multiple countries and demographics. Examples of current grantees include High Impact ProfessionalsImpactful Policy Careers, and Probably Good

Effective careers currently comprises around ~20% of our portfolio. We are excited about increasing this percentage and have been positively surprised by the growth potential of the effective careers ecosystem. We believe that there are more organizations, projects, and individuals doing work that would fit our portfolio. Through this RFP, we hope to: 

  1. Invite and encourage new and existing effective career organizations to apply for funding
  2. Pitch potential organizations and programs we would be excited to see in the space
  3. Simplify and standardize the application process for both applicants and our internal review team
  4. Better understand the current funding needs and gaps within the effective careers space  

Eligibility

Any organization or project contributing to effective career development is eligible to apply. This includes, but is not limited to: 

Additional Considerations: 

Your organization should be able to justify how it can use (additional) funding in a cost-effective way. 

Existing grantees on renewable grants will continue to be assessed for general support on their regular schedule. However, they are welcome to apply for top-up funding if they believe they can utilize additional funds cost-effectively.

Potential ideas we’d be excited about: 

(This is not an exhaustive list, but we hope it helps spark ideas and generate interest.)

Funding amount and grant structure

In general, we think unrestricted funding for general operating support is often the most valuable kind of funding, so we aim to provide that by default where possible. That being said, we are open to funding specific projects or needs. Additionally, other factors such as the grantee’s corporate structure may influence how we structure our grant.

We expect most grants to be for one or two years, and to be non-renewable by default.

Selection criteria and evaluation process

We expect to consider the following key factors in our assessment:

The application form is designed to be comprehensive and provide all of the information we think we will need to assess the candidates. That being said, we may reach out to certain applicants for additional information. 

Application logistics

You can apply using this link.

Applications are due by Apr 20, 2026.

We expect to make decisions by the beginning of June. Due to the anticipated high number of applications, we won’t be able to provide individualized feedback to organizations we decide not to fund.

If you have any questions regarding eligibility, application requirements, or anything else related to this RFP, please feel free to contact Kearney Capuano (kearney.capuano@coefficientgiving.org) and Melanie Basnak (melanie.basnak@coefficientgiving.org). 


pete @ 2026-03-16T21:43 (+18)

Great news, and excited to see more effective careers organizations start and scale!


Question: why non-renewable by default? Funder diversity is obviously the ideal, but that can trade off with value alignment (especially as projects scale). Are you anticipating building longer-term partnerships with organizations that outperform other grantees?


[No expectation to respond here, but wanted to ask in case]

Melanie Basnak🔸 @ 2026-03-18T15:07 (+4)

Thanks for your question pete!

The non-renewable default comes from a couple of things:
(1) we see these RFP grants as more experimental and hits-based than our standard portfolio. We're casting a wider net to find promising new efforts, and by nature not all of them will work out.
(2) we don't want to tie up most of our budget in renewal commitments, since that would limit our flexibility to respond to new opportunities.

That said, this isn't a hard rule. For organizations with a solid track record that we can see fitting really well into our portfolio on an ongoing basis, we'd definitely consider making renewable grants. And for orgs we seed through this RFP that end up doing well, we'd likely consider bringing them into our portfolio on a more ongoing basis further down the line.

Judith Rensing @ 2026-03-25T16:25 (+1)

Exciting to see! I'm also glad it's an open RFP, really useful for building a space. Hope it'll yield lots of exciting new projects in the space.