Apply to CLR as a researcher or summer research fellow!

By Chi @ 2022-02-01T22:24 (+62)

Link to apply

 

We, the Center on Long-Term Risk, are looking for researchers to explore strategies for reducing suffering in the long-term future (s-risk). We are currently offering temporary and permanent roles:

Your contributions to our research program will have a positive impact through their influence on our strategic direction, grantmaking, communications, events, and other activities. You will work autonomously on challenging research questions relevant to reducing suffering. You will become part of our team of intellectually curious, hard-working, and caring people, all of whom share a profound drive to make the biggest difference they can.

We are worried that some people might not apply because they wrongly believe they are not a good fit for working with us. While such a belief is sometimes true, it is often the result of underconfidence rather than an accurate assessment. We would therefore love to see your application even if you are not sure if you are qualified or otherwise competent enough for the positions listed. We explicitly have no minimum requirements in terms of formal qualifications and many of the past summer research fellows have had no or little prior research experience. Being rejected this year will not reduce your chances of being accepted in future hiring rounds. If you have any doubts, please don’t hesitate to reach out (see “Application process” > “Inquiries” below).

 

Roles

Summer Research Fellow

Purpose of the fellowship

The purpose of the fellowship varies from fellow to fellow. In the past, have we often had the following types of people take part in the fellowship:

There might be many other good reasons for completing the fellowship. We encourage you to apply if you think you would benefit from the program, even if your reason is not listed above. In all cases, we will work with you to make the fellowship as valuable as possible given your strengths and needs. In many cases, this will mean focusing on learning and testing your fit for s-risk research, more than seeking to produce immediately valuable research output.

 

Responsibilities

 

What we look for in candidates

We don’t require specific qualifications or experience for this role, but the following abilities and qualities are what we’re looking for in candidates. We encourage you to apply if you think you may be a good fit, even if you are unsure whether you meet some of the criteria.

 

Further details

We encourage you to apply even if any of the below does not work for you. We are happy to be flexible for exceptional candidates, including when it comes to program length and compensation.

 

Researcher

Responsibilities

We will adapt the responsibilities of the role to the strengths and preferences of each successful candidate, but they usually include:

Depending on your experience and skill set, we might ask you to supervise junior researchers or research fellows on our team.

Successful applicants will be supervised by either Daniel Kokotajlo or Emery Cooper.

 

What we look for in candidates

We don’t require specific qualifications or experience for this role, but the following abilities and qualities are what we’re looking for in candidates. We recognize that some of these qualities could be hard to test well outside a similar role, and we believe that smart, curious generalists can make substantial contributions, even if they lack formal training in any field related to our focus areas. We therefore encourage you to apply if you think you may be a good fit, even if you are unsure whether you meet several of the criteria.

Relevant academic education, such as a master’s degree or higher in a related field, can be a useful indicator for some of the above qualities but is not a requirement.

 

Further details

 

Priority areas

You can find an overview of our current priority areas here. However, If we believe that you can somehow advance high-quality research relevant to s-risks, we are interested in creating a position for you. If you see a way to contribute to our research agenda or have other ideas for reducing s-risks, please apply. We commonly tailor our positions to the strengths and interests of the applicants.

 

Application process

We value your time and are aware that applications can be demanding, so we have thought carefully about making the application process time-efficient and transparent. We plan to make the final decisions between April 10 and April 17. Please submit this form if you require an earlier decision, for example, if you will have to confirm whether you will take part in another summer program.

Stage 1: To start your application for any role, please complete our application form. As part of this form, we also ask you to submit your CV/resume and give you the opportunity to upload an optional research sample. The deadline is Sunday, February 27, 2022 end of day anywhere. We expect this to take around 2 to 3 hours if you are already familiar with our work. In the interest of your time, you do not need to polish the language of your answers in the application form.

Stage 2: By Sunday, March 6, we will decide whether to invite you to the second stage. If you requested an expedited application process, we will also let you know if your request has been granted. We will ask you to write a research proposal (up to two pages excluding references) and two research proposal sketches, to be submitted by Sunday, March 27 end of day anywhere. This means applicants will have 3 weeks to complete this stage, which we expect will take up to 12h of work. Applicants may therefore want to keep some time free during this period to work on this. Applicants will be compensated with £400 for their work on this stage.

Stage 3: By Sunday, April 3, we will decide whether to invite you to an interview via video call during the week of April 4. By Sunday, April 17, we will

 

Further details

 

Inquiries

If you have any questions about the process, please contact us at hiring@longtermrisk.org. If you want to send an email not accessible to the hiring committee, please contact Amrit Sidhu-Brar at amrit.sidhu-brar@longtermrisk.org.

We will also host two open video calls for any questions about this hiring round or working at CLR more generally. Sign up here to receive an invitation to the video call. They will take place at the following times:

 

Benefits

In addition to their salary, CLR offers the following benefits to all staff (including Summer Research Fellows):

 

Why work at CLR

We aim to combine the best aspects of academic research (depth, scholarship, mentorship) with an altruistic mission to prevent negative future scenarios. So we leave out the less productive features of academia, such as precarious employment and publish-or-perish incentives, while adding a focus on impact and application.

As part of our team, you will enjoy:

You will advance neglected research to reduce the most severe risks to our civilization in the long-term future. Depending on your specific project, your work will help inform our activities across any of the following paths to impact:

New projects: In collaboration with people in our network, we are always looking for novel impactful organizations to set up. For instance, we have been involved in the founding of the Cooperative AI Foundation and the Foundations of Cooperative AI Lab. Previously, we established Wild Animal Suffering Research, which later merged with Utility Farm to become the Wild Animal Initiative, a now independent organization.


Chi @ 2022-02-01T22:55 (+15)

Some data that I didn't formally write up and put in the post (mostly for time reasons) on how past fellows evaluated the fellowship:

 

2021

10 out of 14 fellows filled in the fellowship feedback survey:

It's possible that the respondents were anchored by the possible options for the last question: There was one option "about as valuable" and 4 options each in the directions more and less valuable. The lowest respondents could go was "not at all valuable (<10% of counterfactual)"

The survey was not anonymous (although the name field was optional and one respondent chose not to enter their name) and several of the respondents were either in employment, on a grant, or on a trial with us at the time of responding.

 

2020

7 out of 9 fellows filled in the fellowship feedback survey:

The survey was anonymous in 2020. Several of the respondents were either in employment, on a grant, or on a trial with us at the time of responding.

Question Mark @ 2022-02-02T23:47 (+5)

Do you plan on holding any other S-Risk Intro Fellowships anytime soon? If so, when might they take place? It looks like you're holding one throughout this month, but the deadline for this upcoming fellowship has passed. If you plan on holding intro fellowships in the future, what would you say are the most important articles/videos/books to read/watch in order to prepare for it?

Chi @ 2022-02-03T15:04 (+6)

Thanks for the question! It's unclear whether we'll run an S-Risk Intro Fellowship in this precise format again. We are fairly likely to run intro events with similar content in the future though. I think this will most likely happen on an annual or semi-annual basis.

Aaron__Maiwald @ 2022-02-12T10:55 (+1)

Hey! I wonder how flexible the starting date is. My semester ends mid-July, so I couldn't start before. This is probably the case for most students from Germany. Is that too late?

Chi @ 2022-02-13T15:17 (+2)

Thanks for asking! We would definitely consider later starts if people aren't available earlier and I would be surprised if we rejected a strong candidate just on the basis that they are only available a month later. There's some chance we would shorten the default fellowship length (not necessarily by the same number of weeks that they would start later) for them, though but we would discuss this with them first. I think if they would only accept the fellowship if it starts later and is the original 9 weeks long, this would increase the threshold for accepting them somewhat, but again, I would be surprised if we rejected a very strong candidate just on the basis. (I think it would only matter for edge cases.) It also depends a bit on what other applications we get: E.g. if we get many strong applications for Germans who can only start later, we would probably be much more happy to accommodate all of them.