Optimistic Assumptions, Longterm Planning, and "Cope"
By Raemon @ 2024-07-18T00:06 (+15)
This is a crosspost, probably from LessWrong. Try viewing it there.
nullSummaryBot @ 2024-07-18T14:27 (+1)
Executive summary: Researchers and planners often make overly optimistic assumptions when faced with difficult problems, which can lead to flawed strategies and overconfidence in uncertain domains like AI alignment.
Key points:
- People tend to slip into more "convenient" worldviews when faced with seemingly impossible challenges, often overestimating the likelihood of favorable assumptions.
- Experiments show that even smart researchers repeatedly make overconfident predictions when solving unfamiliar puzzles.
- It's easy to focus on areas where one feels traction, even if those areas aren't actually crucial to solving the core problem.
- Real-world research, especially in AI alignment, lacks clear feedback loops, making it difficult to develop reliable "research taste."
- Recommendations for researchers include: diversifying problem-solving experience, critically examining assumptions, seeking mentorship, and considering the full chain of events needed for research to have impact.
- The author emphasizes the need for better feedback loops in rationality and research, though admits not having a clear solution yet.
This comment was auto-generated by the EA Forum Team. Feel free to point out issues with this summary by replying to the comment, and contact us if you have feedback.