Disagreement = Counterfactuality for Matching Funds

By ellie @ 2026-07-06T19:37 (+2)

Much has been said about how hard it is to have valid counterfactual matching funds.

In particular, to summarize from Jeff Kaufman here:

Allow me to posit a more general principle: Any time two actors agree about whether one thing is good but disagree about whether another thing is good, there is an opportunity to have meaningfully counterfactual matching.

To give an example:

Perhaps, if you ignore overhead costs, you should probably offer matching funds instead of donating directly any time you are indifferent between multiple donation options, since it might spur others to donate as well.

AI Model Usage: Not used