Map of the biosecurity landscape (list of GCBR-relevant orgs for newcomers)

By Max Görlitz @ 2023-09-17T08:56 (+151)

This is a linkpost to https://bit.ly/biosecurity-map

When talking to newcomers to the field of biosecurity, I often felt annoyed that there wasn't a single introductory resource I could point them to that gives an overview of all the biosecurity-relevant organizations, upskilling opportunities, and funders. 

With the help of a lot of contributors, I started this Google doc to provide such a resource. I'm sure that we missed some relevant organizations, and it'd be lovely if some people were to comment on the doc with additional information!

I'll copy the current version below, but please check out the link to the doc if you want to comment and see the most up-to-date version in the future!


Contributors: Max Görlitz, Simon Grimm, Andreas Prenner, Jasper Götting, Anemone Franz, Eva Siegmann, & more

Introduction

I would like to see something like aisafety.world for biosecurity. There already exists the Map of Biosecurity Interventions, but I want one for organizations!

This is a work-in-progress attempt to create a minimum viable product. Please suggest/comment on additional information, and feel free to add your name to the list of contributors. 

Also, see this Substack newsletter, “GCBR Organization Updates,” which provides a very useful overview and quarterly updates of biosecurity organizations.  

Policy

Think tanks

Europe

Explicitly focused on catastrophic or existential risks from pandemics

Focused on general pandemic preparedness/mitigation or biological weapons

USA

(Inter)governmental actors

USA

Europe

International actors

Technical R&D

While there are GCBR-focused or EA-aligned organizations working directly on technical biosecurity interventions, the majority of relevant work is being done in academia and, to a lesser extent, industry/startups. A strong tail-risk awareness is still very relevant in policy, but after having identified promising technical interventions, it is now more important to interface with existing domain expertise. We’d thus recommend newcomers interested in working on technical biosecurity to explore traditional careers focussed on relevant biosecurity-relevant R&D.

GCBR-focused non-profits

Relevant for-profits

Academic labs

Upskilling (fellowships)

Focused on newcomers

E-learning resources

Focused on people with some experience

Funders of work on biorisk mitigation

Major funders explicitly focused on catastrophic biorisk

Smaller funders with some part of their portfolio dedicated to catastrophic biorisk

Funders that are focused on pandemic preparedness more broadly


Anemone @ 2023-09-18T08:38 (+9)

Thanks for putting this together, Max! 

peterhartree @ 2023-09-18T13:30 (+7)

Thanks for this. I'd be keen to see a longer list of the interesting for-profits in this space.

Biobot Analytics (wastewater monitoring) are the only for-profit on the 80,000 Hours job board list.

Alex D @ 2023-09-19T16:10 (+3)

This is a pretty good overview: https://www.decodingbio.com/p/decoding-biosecurity-and-biodefense

I know the space reasonably well, happy to connect and discuss with anyone interested!

JoshuaBlake @ 2023-09-17T12:09 (+7)

Some UK additions.

Government

Academic

There's lots of labs across various institutions depending on what (sub)-field your after. Pretty much everyone relevant in the sciences (including behavioural sciences and some engineering) were included in the SAGE Advisory Groups. UKRI is the parent body for governmental funding is academia and the various sub-bodies ("research councils") do funding of all kinds of pandemic-relevant work (including social sciences, mathematics, engineering, biology).

Other

The Institute for Government is an independent think tank focused on masking government work better. They've done some work (including in collaboration with CLTR) looking at how the COVID response went and emergency preparedness more broadly.

Ben Stewart @ 2023-09-17T11:41 (+5)

What a fantastic resource, thanks all! Also may be worth adding, the new National Security Commission on Emerging Biotechnology, which will be delivering a 2024 report based on “a thorough review of how advances in emerging biotechnology and related technologies will shape current and future activities of the Department of Defense“ - delivering it to the DoD, White House, and Congress.

jtm @ 2023-09-18T07:53 (+4)

This is a very welcome contribution to a professional field (ie., the GCBR-focused parts of the pandemic preparedness and biosecurity space) that can often feel opaque and poorly coordinated — sincere thanks to Max and everyone else who helped make it!

James Herbert @ 2023-09-18T09:49 (+3)

Great resource! Some Dutch suggestions: 

The Biosecurity Office: "The Biosecurity Office is a national information centre for the government and for organisations that work with high-risk biological material.

The Biosecurity Office shares knowledge and information about biosecurity and increases awareness about biosecurity, in order to minimise the risk of misuse of high risk pathogens, knowledge and technologies. The Biosecurity Office increases biosecurity awareness in the Netherlands by organizing a Biosecurity Knowledge Day in the Netherlands annually, by giving lectures and workshops, by developing knowledge products and web applications, and by joining international biosecurity initiatives."

The Pandemic and Disaster Preparedness Centre: "Erasmus MC, TU Delft and Erasmus University Rotterdam have joined forces in the Pandemic and Disaster Preparedness Center (PDPC).

PDPC aims to prepare society for future pandemics and disasters. We will reduce vulnerabilities and risks and build resilience through effective disaster prevention, preparedness and recovery measures. Convergence of the technical, medical and social sciences is essential for developing the next generation of approaches to disasters and pandemics.’"